How to compute phosphorescence rates

Use this forum for general discussions of topics that don't fit in the other forums
Post Reply
ethan
Posts: 1
Joined: 01 May 2020, 11:12
First name(s): Ethan
Last name(s): Thomas
Affiliation: Uppsala University
Country: Sweden

How to compute phosphorescence rates

Post by ethan » 01 May 2020, 11:18

Can you please provide me a quick tutorial on how to compute phosphorescence rates (T1 => S0)? Also which is the best method to compute it? How does the input look like?

User avatar
magnus
Posts: 523
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:32
First name(s): Jógvan Magnus
Middle name(s): Haugaard
Last name(s): Olsen
Affiliation: Aarhus University
Country: Denmark

Re: How to compute phosphorescence rates

Post by magnus » 01 May 2020, 15:19

I'm don't know if such a tutorial exists. Also I cannot help you with the choice of best method. I'd recommend that you do a literature search for that. With respect to the input, you need a structure like this (where of course the ... in the wavefunction part has to be changed to something reasonable):

Code: Select all

**DALTON INPUT
.RUN RESPONS
**INTEGRALS
.SPIN-ORBIT
**WAVE FUNCTIONS
...
**RESPONS
*QUADRATIC
.PHOSPHORESENCE
.ROOTS
 4
**END OF DALTON INPUT
The specification of number of roots assumes that you do not use point-group symmetry or that your molecule has no symmetry.

taylor
Posts: 595
Joined: 15 Oct 2013, 05:37
First name(s): Peter
Middle name(s): Robert
Last name(s): Taylor
Affiliation: Tianjin University
Country: China

Re: How to compute phosphorescence rates

Post by taylor » 02 May 2020, 13:53

Another aspect to consider is what sort of molecules and electronic states you are interested in. If the systems are composed of lighter atoms, like a typical organic molecule, then you should consider the AMFI approximation for dealing with the spin-orbit terms (this is described in the manual). AMFI is much less computationally demanding than the full (one- and two-electron) spin-orbit treatment, and our own investigations (among many others) confirm that for typical excited states of small organic systems there is essentially no difference between the results obtained with AMFI and those with the full operator.

On the other hand, if you are interested in systems involving significantly heavier atoms it may be that AMFI is less appropriate. If you are concerned about this you could try to find a suitable model system which you can use to calibrate AMFI against the full operator.

Best regards
Pete

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest