Hello:
I recently used the method of PBEx to calculate phosphorescence with Dalton. I used the method of pbepbe when I used Gaussin optimization, but I couldn't use pbepbe when Dalton calculated phosphorescence, so I chose pbex. I wonder what's the difference between pbepbe and pbex? and What keywords do I need to match them?
Looking forward to your reply.
Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 18:44
- First name(s): Hans Jørgen
- Middle name(s): Aagaard
- Last name(s): Jensen
- Affiliation: Universith of Southern Denmark
- Country: Denmark
Re: Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
Gaussian PBEPBE is just PBE in Dalton input (and in many other programs).
PBEx is just the exchange part, without the correlation part of the PBE functional.
PBEx is just the exchange part, without the correlation part of the PBE functional.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
- First name(s): hong
- Last name(s): wang
- Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
- Country: China
Re: Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
@ MPI MASTER, node no.: 0
@ Reason: functional not fully implemented/tested for QR
Total CPU time used in DALTON: 10 minutes 33 seconds
Total wall time used in DALTON: 10 minutes 34 seconds
QTRACE dump of internal trace stack
========================
level module
========================
3 RSPDRV
2 DALTON
1 DALTON main
========================
When I use a function like PBE, the output document will have errors, as shown above. How can I modify the key words in the input file to make the output result normal?
@ Reason: functional not fully implemented/tested for QR
Total CPU time used in DALTON: 10 minutes 33 seconds
Total wall time used in DALTON: 10 minutes 34 seconds
QTRACE dump of internal trace stack
========================
level module
========================
3 RSPDRV
2 DALTON
1 DALTON main
========================
When I use a function like PBE, the output document will have errors, as shown above. How can I modify the key words in the input file to make the output result normal?
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 27 Aug 2013, 16:42
- First name(s): Kenneth
- Last name(s): Ruud
- Affiliation: UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Country: Norway
Re: Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
As the error message states, it is not possible to use this functional in quadratic response calculations. Please consider using a different functional.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
- First name(s): hong
- Last name(s): wang
- Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
- Country: China
Re: Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
Is there no way to use this functional PBE by mediating the parameters in the input file?
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 27 Aug 2013, 16:42
- First name(s): Kenneth
- Last name(s): Ruud
- Affiliation: UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Country: Norway
Re: Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
Not in a quadratic response calculation. The problem is that there you will need derivatives of the exchange-correlation kernels which have not been implemented for this functional. LSDalton will be able to do this in principle, since it uses the XCFun library to generate the necessary XC kernel derivatives, but then instead LSDalton cannot calculate phosphorescence (only singlet quadratic response). The development version of ReSpect should now be able to calculate the require transition moments using the PBE functional, but then instead you would do the calculations at the relativistic two- or four-component level of theory. But at the same time, it is bleeding-edge code, and we have not really thoroughly tested it for spin-forbidden transitions.
Kenneth
Kenneth
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
- First name(s): hong
- Last name(s): wang
- Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
- Country: China
Re: Conversion of PBEPBE and pbex
OK, I got it.
Thank you for your reply,
Thank you for your reply,
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests