Respected Dalton users,
Is it possible to perform linear- and/or quadratic-response theory calculations using QM/MM with polarizable embedding scheme?
I tried to run it using some guessed inputs (attached). The calculations finished successfully but I'm not sure whether or not it is correct. Please have a look at the inputs and tell me whether it is right or not.
I just took the potential file from DALTON manual. It is as follows:
! two water molecules
@COORDINATES
10
AA
O -3.328 -0.103 -0.0
H -2.503 0.413 0.0
H -4.039 0.546 -0.0
X -2.916 0.154 -0.0
X -3.683 0.221 -0.0
O 1.742 2.341 -0.0
H 0.841 1.971 -0.0
H 1.632 3.298 0.004
X 1.291 2.156 -0.0
X 1.687 2.819 0.001
@MULTIPOLES
ORDER 0
6
1 -0.742
2 0.369
3 0.372
6 -0.742
7 0.369
8 0.372
With best regards,
Mehboob
Response theory using PEQM
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 11 Nov 2013, 03:14
- First name(s): Md. Mehboob
- Last name(s): Alam
- Affiliation: Universite de Strasbourg
- Country: India
Response theory using PEQM
- Attachments
-
- molecule.mol
- mol file
- (178 Bytes) Downloaded 524 times
-
- qmmm.dal
- dal file
- (161 Bytes) Downloaded 514 times
- magnus
- Posts: 524
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:32
- First name(s): Jógvan Magnus
- Middle name(s): Haugaard
- Last name(s): Olsen
- Affiliation: Aarhus University
- Country: Denmark
Re: Response theory using PEQM
Yes, both are possible.mehboob.cu wrote:Is it possible to perform linear- and/or quadratic-response theory calculations using QM/MM with polarizable embedding scheme?
Right or not for what? You used guessed inputs so obviously the result will not make any sense. It is difficult to say whether your calculation is correct without any actual output.mehboob.cu wrote:I tried to run it using some guessed inputs (attached). The calculations finished successfully but I'm not sure whether or not it is correct. Please have a look at the inputs and tell me whether it is right or not.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 11 Nov 2013, 03:14
- First name(s): Md. Mehboob
- Last name(s): Alam
- Affiliation: Universite de Strasbourg
- Country: India
Re: Response theory using PEQM
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry for not being clear in asking "right or not". By that I mean whether the input files are correct or not. I have attached the output file.
Best regards,
Mehboob
Sorry for not being clear in asking "right or not". By that I mean whether the input files are correct or not. I have attached the output file.
Best regards,
Mehboob
- Attachments
-
- qmmm_molecule_m1.out
- (47.17 KiB) Downloaded 523 times
- magnus
- Posts: 524
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:32
- First name(s): Jógvan Magnus
- Middle name(s): Haugaard
- Last name(s): Olsen
- Affiliation: Aarhus University
- Country: Denmark
Re: Response theory using PEQM
Looks good to me. You can see in the output that the potential is read in and what it contains:
The energies due to the embedding potential are also printed after the SCF is done:
Code: Select all
Reading potential input file for polarizable embedding calculation
.------------------------------------------------.
| Information from polarizable embedding library |
`------------------------------------------------´
Number of classical sites: 10
Multipole moments upto 0th order.
Code: Select all
.--------------------------------------------------.
| Final results from polarizable embedding library |
`--------------------------------------------------´
Polarizable embedding energy contributions:
---------------------------------------------
Electrostatic contributions:
Monopoles -0.005009629794
Total PE energy: -0.005009629794
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 11 Nov 2013, 03:14
- First name(s): Md. Mehboob
- Last name(s): Alam
- Affiliation: Universite de Strasbourg
- Country: India
Re: Response theory using PEQM
Hi Magnus,
Thanks a lot for looking into my output file and comments.
Wish you and all the DALTON TEAM a progressive, cheerful and successful New year 2016.
Regards,
Mehboob
Thanks a lot for looking into my output file and comments.
Wish you and all the DALTON TEAM a progressive, cheerful and successful New year 2016.
Regards,
Mehboob
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest