Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Find answers or ask questions regarding Dalton calculations.
Please upload an output file showing the problem, if applicable.
(It is not necessary to upload input files, they can be found in the output file.)

Post Reply
wanghong
Posts: 18
Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
First name(s): hong
Last name(s): wang
Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
Country: China

Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by wanghong » 05 Nov 2019, 11:52

Hi everyone,
I encounter problems while calculate Phosphorescence emission using PBE functional, the .dal and part of .mol and of .out files are attached below.
Could anyone help me fix it?
I'm using the 2018 version of Dalton, by the way.




@ MPI MASTER, node no.: 0
@ Reason: functional not fully implemented/tested for QR

Total CPU time used in DALTON: 13 minutes 17 seconds
Total wall time used in DALTON: 13 minutes 19 seconds


QTRACE dump of internal trace stack

========================
level module
========================
3 RSPDRV
2 DALTON
1 DALTON main
========================
Attachments
21C2-dal.out
(156.63 KiB) Downloaded 9 times
21C2-dal.mol
(2.89 KiB) Downloaded 9 times
21C2-dal.dal
(170 Bytes) Downloaded 9 times

User avatar
magnus
Posts: 478
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:32
First name(s): Jógvan Magnus
Middle name(s): Haugaard
Last name(s): Olsen
Affiliation: Hylleraas Centre, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Country: Norway

Re: Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by magnus » 05 Nov 2019, 12:24

wanghong wrote:
05 Nov 2019, 11:52
@ Reason: functional not fully implemented/tested for QR
That is the reason. I believe the following post is still the current list of functionals and the order to which they've been tested:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=253&p=1667&hilit=fu ... r+QR#p2053

wanghong
Posts: 18
Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
First name(s): hong
Last name(s): wang
Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
Country: China

Re: Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by wanghong » 05 Nov 2019, 13:05

Sorry, sir. Because I just contacted Dalton, I read the post you said above, but I didn't quite understand it.What is 2 in "1 is LR, 2 is QR, 3 is cr."? How should I write in the input file?

User avatar
magnus
Posts: 478
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:32
First name(s): Jógvan Magnus
Middle name(s): Haugaard
Last name(s): Olsen
Affiliation: Hylleraas Centre, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Country: Norway

Re: Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by magnus » 05 Nov 2019, 13:11

You are trying to compute a quadratic response function and the program is telling you that the functional you used is either not fully implemented or not tested for quadratic response.

The list of functionals that i linked to shows which alternative functionals you can use instead. Here, 1 means that it can be used for linear response only, 2 means linear and quadratic response, and 3 means linear, quadratic, and cubic response.

wanghong
Posts: 18
Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
First name(s): hong
Last name(s): wang
Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
Country: China

Re: Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by wanghong » 05 Nov 2019, 13:52

That is to say, if I want to calculate the phosphorescence, I can't use the function PBE, right?

User avatar
magnus
Posts: 478
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 16:32
First name(s): Jógvan Magnus
Middle name(s): Haugaard
Last name(s): Olsen
Affiliation: Hylleraas Centre, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Country: Norway

Re: Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by magnus » 05 Nov 2019, 13:53

Yes, that is correct as far as the program tells you and as far as I know. I've asked some of the developers if anything has changed in this respect since the time of the post with the list that I linked to.

wanghong
Posts: 18
Joined: 30 May 2019, 09:01
First name(s): hong
Last name(s): wang
Affiliation: Nanjing Tech University
Country: China

Re: Phosphorescence Calculation with pbe functional

Post by wanghong » 05 Nov 2019, 14:04

OK, I got it.Thank you very much.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests